Norton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Norton v. State

160 So. 3d 528, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4723, 2015 WL 1442531

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 31, 2015

DocketNo. 1D14-1370

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 160 So. 3d 528 (Norton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norton v. State, 160 So. 3d 528, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4723, 2015 WL 1442531 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record on appeal, we affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we do so without prejudice to Appellant’s filing a post-conviction motion to correct unpreserved sentencing errors related to costs and fines imposed. See A.L.B. v. State, 23 So.3d 190, 192 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“Today’s affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief collaterally[.]”); Colon v. State, 869 So.2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (“[O]ur affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s filing an appropriate post-conviction motion raising any such unpreserved sentencing issues.”).

AFFIRMED.

MARSTILLER, SWANSON and OSTERHAUS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record on appeal, we affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we do so without prejudice to Appellant’s filing a post-conviction motion to correct unpreserved sentencing errors related to costs and fines imposed. See A.L.B. v. State, 23 So.3d 190, 192 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“Today’s affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief collaterally[.]”); Colon v. State, 869 So.2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (“[O]ur affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s filing an appropriate post-conviction motion raising any such unpreserved sentencing issues.”).

AFFIRMED.

MARSTILLER, SWANSON and OSTERHAUS, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 So. 3d 528, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4723, 2015 WL 1442531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack