Paris v. City of New York

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Paris v. City of New York

189 Misc. 445, 74 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3288

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 19, 1947·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Memorandum

Per Curiam.

The judgment and order should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs to defetidant and complaint dismissed with appropriate costs in the court below. The District Attorney did not exceed his authority in suspending without pay for thirty days pending determination of the charges and thereafter suspending for two more months without pay. The Civil Service Law (§ 22, subd. 3) required the plaintiff to appeal to the Civil Service Commission or proceed under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to test the determination made by her superior officer. The latter had power to suspend for two months without pay in addition to" the thirty days pending determination of the charges. (Cf. Halpin v. City of New York, 54 Misc. 128.) The statute does not, where charges are sustained, revive the-right to salary for the period of suspension.

MacCratb, Steinbrink and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum

Per Curiam.

The judgment and order should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs to defetidant and complaint dismissed with appropriate costs in the court below. The District Attorney did not exceed his authority in suspending without pay for thirty days pending determination of the charges and thereafter suspending for two more months without pay. The Civil Service Law (§ 22, subd. 3) required the plaintiff to appeal to the Civil Service Commission or proceed under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to test the determination made by her superior officer. The latter had power to suspend for two months without pay in addition to" the thirty days pending determination of the charges. (Cf. Halpin v. City of New York, 54 Misc. 128.) The statute does not, where charges are sustained, revive the-right to salary for the period of suspension.

MacCratb, Steinbrink and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.

Paris v. City of New York, 189 Misc. 445, 74 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

189 Misc. 445 (Paris v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related