Parham v. Edwards

470 F.2d 1000
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 16, 1973·No. No. 72-3001·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

For reasons sufficiently stated by the District Court, 346 F.Supp. 968 (S.D.Georgia 1972), the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parham v. Edwards, 470 F.2d 1000 (5th Cir. 1973).

470 F.2d 1000 (Parham v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferens v. Deere & Co.
862 F.2d 31 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Ellis v. Great Southwestern Corp.
646 F.2d 1099 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Lang v. Windsor Mount Joy Mutual Insurance
487 F. Supp. 1303 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1980)
Froelich v. Petrelli
472 F. Supp. 756 (D. Hawaii, 1979)
Haire v. Miller
447 F. Supp. 57 (N.D. Mississippi, 1977)
Watwood v. Barber
70 F.R.D. 1 (N.D. Georgia, 1975)
Stanley Works v. Globemaster, Inc.
400 F. Supp. 1325 (D. Massachusetts, 1975)
Thornton v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc.
397 F. Supp. 476 (N.D. Georgia, 1975)