Pargas, Inc., a Maryland Corporation v. Empire Gas Corp., a Missouri Corporation

546 F.2d 25
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 14, 1976·No. 76-1624·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the record and briefs and after hearing argument, we are satisfied that the factual findings of the district court are not erroneous, that the district court correctly applied the law, and that it committed no abuse of discretion in formulating and issuing a preliminary injunction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pargas, Inc., a Maryland Corporation v. Empire Gas Corp., a Missouri Corporation, 546 F.2d 25 (4th Cir. 1976).

546 F.2d 25 (Pargas, Inc., a Maryland Corporation v. Empire Gas Corp., a Missouri Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simon Property Group, Inc. v. Taubman Centers, Inc.
261 F. Supp. 2d 919 (E.D. Michigan, 2003)
Shepard v. Meridian Ins. Group, Inc.
137 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (S.D. Indiana, 2001)
Emerald Partners v. Berlin
712 A.2d 1006 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1997)
CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. Custom Optical Frames, Inc.
893 F. Supp. 508 (D. Maryland, 1995)
Amanda Acquisition Corp. v. Universal Foods Corp.
708 F. Supp. 984 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1989)
West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Farley Inc.
711 F. Supp. 1088 (N.D. Georgia, 1988)
Koppers Co., Inc. v. American Exp. Co.
689 F. Supp. 1371 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1988)
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Edelman
666 F. Supp. 799 (M.D. North Carolina, 1987)
Martin v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.
639 F. Supp. 931 (D. Maryland, 1986)
Simon v. Culverhouse
609 F. Supp. 1050 (S.D. Florida, 1985)
Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc.
562 F. Supp. 304 (S.D. New York, 1983)
Martin Marietta Corp. v. Bendix Corp.
547 F. Supp. 533 (D. Maryland, 1982)
Crouse-Hinds Co. v. Internorth, Inc.
518 F. Supp. 416 (N.D. New York, 1980)
United States v. United Technologies Corp.
466 F. Supp. 196 (N.D. New York, 1979)