Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc.

953 So. 2d 58, 2007 La. LEXIS 1499, 2007 WL 1064315
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 980 So. 2d 634
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 5, 2007·No. No. 2007-C-0225·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

La. Const, art. V, § 8(B) provides that a “majority of the judges sitting in a case must concur to render judgment.” Under its constitutional authority to review cases, the court of appeal must consider and decide each case. In the instant case, the court of appeal did not reach a majority judgment on all issues. Accordingly, the court of appeal’s judgment is vacated in full and this case is remanded to the court of appeal to be considered en banc, for briefing, argument, and full opinion. See Guillot v. Munn, 99—0273 (La.4/23/99), 734 So.2d 613.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc., 953 So. 2d 58, 2007 La. LEXIS 1499, 2007 WL 1064315 (La. 2007).

953 So. 2d 58 (Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guillot v. Munn
734 So. 2d 613 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1999)