Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc.

953 So. 2d 57, 2007 WL 1020836
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 5, 2007·No. No. 2007-C-0220·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

La. Const, art. V, § 8(B) provides that a “majority of the judges sitting in a case must concur to render judgment.” Under its constitutional authority to review cases, the court of appeal must consider and decide each case. In the instant case, the court of appeal did not reach a majority judgment on all issues. Accordingly, the court of appeal’s judgment is vacated in full and this case is remanded to the court of appeal to be considered en banc, for briefing, argument, and full opinion. See [58]*58Guillot v. Munn, 99—0273 (La.4/23/99), 734 So.2d 613.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc., 953 So. 2d 57, 2007 WL 1020836 (La. 2007).

953 So. 2d 57 (Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New Orleans
242 So. 3d 682 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc.
980 So. 2d 634 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2008)
Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc.
992 So. 2d 465 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2007)