Pararas-Carayannis v. United States

518 U.S. 1052, 117 S. Ct. 32, 135 L. Ed. 2d 1123, 65 U.S.L.W. 3204, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 4496

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided September 19, 1996·No. No. A-133 (96-5882)·Published·Cited by 22 cases

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Application for stay, addressed to Justice Kennedy and referred to the Court, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pararas-Carayannis v. United States, 518 U.S. 1052, 117 S. Ct. 32, 135 L. Ed. 2d 1123, 65 U.S.L.W. 3204, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 4496 (1996).

Pincite

518 U.S. 1052 (Pararas-Carayannis v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Midwest Generation EME, LLC v. Continuum Chemical Corp.

768 F. Supp. 2d 939 (N.D. Illinois, 2010)

Nakaranurack v. Holder

312 F. App'x 982 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

United States v. Interian-Mata

363 F. Supp. 2d 1246 (S.D. California, 2005)

Hottle v. BDO Seidman, LLP

846 A.2d 862 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)

Hottle v. BDO Seidman, LLP

811 A.2d 745 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2002)

Kyocera Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Formerly Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation, Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Lapine Technology Corporation, and Lapine Holding Company, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Lapine Technology Corporation v. Kyocera Corporation, Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Fba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees

299 F.3d 769 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc.

299 F.3d 769 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Home Insurance

90 F. Supp. 2d 893 (S.D. Ohio, 2000)

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7075, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9807 Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Helen Smith, an Individual J.A.H., Ltd, a California Limited Partnership Stewart Title Company of San Diego, a California Corporation, Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Helen M. Smith, an Individual M.H.H., a California General Partnership, Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Helen Smith, an Individual, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, and J.A.H., Ltd., a California Limited Partnership, and Stewart Title Company of San Diego, a California Corporation, Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. M. Helen Smith M.H.H., a California General Partnership

155 F.3d 1097 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Citicorp Real Estate, Inc. v. Smith

155 F.3d 1097 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9274, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,953 A.J. Neal v. Edwin Shimoda, Administrator, Correctional Facilities Guy Hall, Administrator, Correctional Facilities Richard Mello, Case Manager, Halawa Correctional Facility Barry Coyne, Administrator, Sex Offender Treatment Program, Halawa Correctional Facility John Does 1-10 Doe Entities 1-10 State of Hawaii, Marshall Martinez v. Shelley Nobriga, H.C.F., Classification Coordinator George Sumner, Dir., Dept. Of Public Safety Edwin Shimoda, Div. Administrator of H.C.F. John Smythe, Administrator for H.C.F., in Their Individual and Official Capacities

131 F.3d 818 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Neal v. Shimoda

131 F.3d 818 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9183, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,835 Lapine Technology Corporation v. Kyocera Corporation, Kyocera Corporation v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc. Lapine Holding Co. Lapine Technology Corporation, Lapine Technology Corporation v. Kyocera Corporation, Kyocera Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc. Lapine Technology Corporation Lapine Holding Company Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Kyocera Corporation v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Fdba Prudential-Bache Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc. Lapine Technology Corporation Lapine Holding Co.

130 F.3d 884 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Lapine Technology Corp. v. Kyocera Corp.

130 F.3d 884 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Milton BARNES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Martin LOGAN, Koren Logan, Trustees for the Logan Inter Vivos Trust, Respondents-Appellees

122 F.3d 820 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5496, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8907 Brenda Premo, Director of the Department of Rehabilitation, State of California v. Jeana Martin the United States Department of Education Richard W. Riley, Secretary of the United States Department of Education

119 F.3d 764 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Premo v. Martin

119 F.3d 764 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4943, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,071, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8072 Mohammed Baher Elramly v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

116 F.3d 435 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Elramly v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

116 F.3d 435 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Wages v. Smith Barney Harris Upham & Co.

937 P.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1997)