Paradise v. Prescott

M.D. Alabama

Paradise v. Prescott

626 F. Supp. 117, 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1744, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13566

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama

DecidedNovember 22, 1985

DocketCiv. A. 3561-N

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 626 F. Supp. 117 (Paradise v. Prescott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paradise v. Prescott, 626 F. Supp. 117, 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1744, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13566 (M.D. Ala. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

This cause is now before the court on the plaintiffs’ September 3 and 5, 1985, petitions for interim attorney fees from the defendant-intervenors for time and expenses incurred by the plaintiffs in the recent appeal of this case. * Paradise v. Prescott, 767 F.2d 1514 (11th Cir.1985). The Eleventh Circuit affirmed this court’s temporary requirement that in the future the Alabama Department of Public Safety promote one black trooper for each white trooper promoted; this court’s later suspension of that requirement; and this court’s approval of new promotion plans, developed by the department, that did not have adverse racial impact against black troopers. Id. See also Paradise v. Prescott, 585 F.Supp. 72 (M.D.Ala. 1983).

For the reasons stated by Judge Morris E. Lasker in Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 524 F.Supp. 1214 (S.D.N.Y.1981), this court is convinced that the defendant-intervenors here are “functionally plaintiffs” and, as plaintiffs, should not bear the opposing party’s attorney fees unless the claims presented by the defendant-intervenors were “frivolous,” “unreasonable,” or “without foundation.” Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 14-16, 101 S.Ct. 173, 178-79, 66 L.Ed.2d 163 (1980); Christiansburg Garment Co. v. E.E.O.C., 434 U.S. 412, 98 S.Ct. 694, 54 L.Ed.2d 648 (1978). Today, the defendant-intervenors are white persons who sought to challenge a promotion scheme they honestly believed discriminated against them because of their race; tomorrow, the defendant-intervenors may very well be black persons seeking to do the same in another lawsuit. They should all be treated the same.

Accordingly, the court being of the opinion that the defendant-intervenors’ claims were not frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ September 3 and 5, 1985, petitions for interim attorney fees from the defendant-intervenors are denied.

*

The plaintiffs have already received interim attorney fees from the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

This cause is now before the court on the plaintiffs’ September 3 and 5, 1985, petitions for interim attorney fees from the defendant-intervenors for time and expenses incurred by the plaintiffs in the recent appeal of this case. * Paradise v. Prescott, 767 F.2d 1514 (11th Cir.1985). The Eleventh Circuit affirmed this court’s temporary requirement that in the future the Alabama Department of Public Safety promote one black trooper for each white trooper promoted; this court’s later suspension of that requirement; and this court’s approval of new promotion plans, developed by the department, that did not have adverse racial impact against black troopers. Id. See also Paradise v. Prescott, 585 F.Supp. 72 (M.D.Ala. 1983).

For the reasons stated by Judge Morris E. Lasker in Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 524 F.Supp. 1214 (S.D.N.Y.1981), this court is convinced that the defendant-intervenors here are “functionally plaintiffs” and, as plaintiffs, should not bear the opposing party’s attorney fees unless the claims presented by the defendant-intervenors were “frivolous,” “unreasonable,” or “without foundation.” Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 14-16, 101 S.Ct. 173, 178-79, 66 L.Ed.2d 163 (1980); Christiansburg Garment Co. v. E.E.O.C., 434 U.S. 412, 98 S.Ct. 694, 54 L.Ed.2d 648 (1978). Today, the defendant-intervenors are white persons who sought to challenge a promotion scheme they honestly believed discriminated against them because of their race; tomorrow, the defendant-intervenors may very well be black persons seeking to do the same in another lawsuit. They should all be treated the same.

Accordingly, the court being of the opinion that the defendant-intervenors’ claims were not frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ September 3 and 5, 1985, petitions for interim attorney fees from the defendant-intervenors are denied.

*

The plaintiffs have already received interim attorney fees from the defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

626 F. Supp. 117, 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1744, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paradise-v-prescott-almd-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack