Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

______________________

March 9, 2015

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2014-1110

IN RE PAPST LICENSING DIGITAL CAMERA PATENT LITIGATION

____________________________________________________

PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,

v.

FUJIFILM CORPORATION, FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION (formerly known as Fujifilm USA, Inc.), HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, JVC COMPANY OF AMERICA, NIKON CORPORATION, NIKON, INC., OLYMPUS CORP., OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION (formerly known as Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., LTD.), PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO., VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD.,

Decided: February 2, 2015 Precedential Opinion

_____________________

2 PAPST LICENSING V. FUJIFILM CORPORATION

Please make the following change:

On page nine, first paragraph, replace the sentence Second, it is undisputed that if we reject all five of the challenged constructions, the summary-judgment orders must be vacated.2

with the following sentence: Second, it is appropriate, if we reject all five of the challenged constructions, to vacate the summary- judgment orders and remand.2

Footnote 2 remains unchanged.