Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided February 3, 2015·No. 14-1110·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

February 3, 2015

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2014-1110

IN RE PAPST LICENSING DIGITAL CAMERA PATENT LITIGATION

PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,

v.

FUJIFILM CORPORATION, FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION (formerly known as Fujifilm USA, Inc.), HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, JVC COMPANY OF AMERICA, NIKON CORPORATION, NIKON, INC., OLYMPUS CORP., OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION (formerly known as Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., LTD.), PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA , SAMSUNG OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO., AND VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD.,

Decided: February 2, 2015 Precedential Opinion

2 PAPST LICENSING V. FUJIFILM CORPORATION

Please make the following change:

On page two, replace the sentence JOHN T. BATTAGLIA, Fisch Hoffman Sigler LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

with the following sentence:

JOHN T. BATTAGLIA, Fisch Sigler LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2015).

Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation (Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.