Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedFebruary 3, 2015
Docket14-1110
StatusPublished

This text of Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation (Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2015).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

February 3, 2015

ERRATA ______________________

Appeal No. 2014-1110

IN RE PAPST LICENSING DIGITAL CAMERA PATENT LITIGATION ____________________________________________________

PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,

v.

FUJIFILM CORPORATION, FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION (formerly known as Fujifilm USA, Inc.), HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, JVC COMPANY OF AMERICA, NIKON CORPORATION, NIKON, INC., OLYMPUS CORP., OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION (formerly known as Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., LTD.), PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA , SAMSUNG OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO., AND VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD.,

Decided: February 2, 2015 Precedential Opinion _____________________ 2 PAPST LICENSING V. FUJIFILM CORPORATION

Please make the following change:

On page two, replace the sentence JOHN T. BATTAGLIA, Fisch Hoffman Sigler LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

with the following sentence: JOHN T. BATTAGLIA, Fisch Sigler LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/papst-licensing-v-fujifilm-corporation-cafc-2015.