PAPALAS v. Ford Motor Company

731 N.W.2d 733
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in PAPALAS v. Ford Motor Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 731 N.W.2d 693
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 30, 2007·No. 130476·Published

Opinion

731 N.W.2d 733 (2007)

Patrick PAPALAS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Metro Industrial Piping, Inc., Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and
Walbridge Aldinger Company, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and
Rouge Steel Company, Detroit Edison Company, and Commercial Contracting Company, Defendants, and
Metro Industrial Painting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.

Docket Nos. 130476, 130477. COA No. 252527.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 30, 2007.

On order of the Court, the motions for miscellaneous relief are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PAPALAS v. Ford Motor Company, 731 N.W.2d 733 (Mich. 2007).

731 N.W.2d 733 (PAPALAS v. Ford Motor Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.