PAPALAS v. Ford Motor Company
731 N.W.2d 733
This text of 731 N.W.2d 733 (PAPALAS v. Ford Motor Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
PAPALAS v. Ford Motor Company, 731 N.W.2d 733 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Patrick PAPALAS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Metro Industrial Piping, Inc., Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and
Walbridge Aldinger Company, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and
Rouge Steel Company, Detroit Edison Company, and Commercial Contracting Company, Defendants, and
Metro Industrial Painting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motions for miscellaneous relief are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
731 N.W.2d 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/papalas-v-ford-motor-company-mich-2007.