Pantlin v. Heicklen Farms, Inc.
403 N.E.2d 185, 49 N.Y.2d 760, 426 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2127
This text of 403 N.E.2d 185 (Pantlin v. Heicklen Farms, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pantlin v. Heicklen Farms, Inc., 403 N.E.2d 185, 49 N.Y.2d 760, 426 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2127 (N.Y. 1980).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the consolidated action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Lizza Inds. v Long Is. Light. Co., 36 NY2d 754).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of New York v. New York City Department of General Services
65 N.Y. 1025 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
403 N.E.2d 185, 49 N.Y.2d 760, 426 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pantlin-v-heicklen-farms-inc-ny-1980.