Pansmith v. Incorporated Village of Island Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pansmith v. Incorporated Village of Island Park

271 A.D.2d 841

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 25, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 841 (Pansmith v. Incorporated Village of Island Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pansmith v. Incorporated Village of Island Park, 271 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order denying defendants’ motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it is insufficient in law. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Defendants’ time to answer is extended until ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The complaint contains three causes of action. If any one of them is sufficient the motion was properly denied. (Halstead V. General By. Signal Co., 268 App. Div. 1060; Adreance v. Lorentzen, 269 App. Div. 987; Allcock V. Cohen, 269 App. Div. 1050.) As a matter of mere pleading the complaint is sufficient in law. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order denying defendants’ motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it is insufficient in law. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Defendants’ time to answer is extended until ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The complaint contains three causes of action. If any one of them is sufficient the motion was properly denied. (Halstead V. General By. Signal Co., 268 App. Div. 1060; Adreance v. Lorentzen, 269 App. Div. 987; Allcock V. Cohen, 269 App. Div. 1050.) As a matter of mere pleading the complaint is sufficient in law. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pansmith-v-incorporated-village-of-island-park-nyappdiv-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack