Allcock v. Cohen
This text of 269 A.D. 843 (Allcock v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action by a city marshal to recover fees allegedly due to him upon various executions issued by defendant attorney upon judgments recovered by his clients, the defendant banks. The plaintiff, and defendant Abraham S. Cohen, cross-appeal from an order granting in part and denying in part a motion by said defendant, pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against him. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs, the amended complaint to be served within ten days from [844]*844the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur. [184 Misc. 620.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 843, 56 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allcock-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1945.