Pannizzo v. Lauro
228 F.2d 222
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 6, 1955·No. No. 99, Docket 23688·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The order of the district court here attempted to be brought before us allowed the case, with its clause for foreign attachment, to proceed, but settled no rights or liabilities of the parties. Hence it is not presently appealable. See Petition of Wills Lines, Inc., 2 Cir., 227 F.2d 509, and cases cited, interpreting 28 U.S.C. § 1292(3).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pannizzo v. Lauro, 228 F.2d 222 (2d Cir. 1955).
228 F.2d 222 (Pannizzo v. Lauro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Costas Hadjipateras, Nicholas Hadjipateras and Dimitri Dracos v. Pacifica, S. A., and George Tsakalotos
290 F.2d 697 (Fifth Circuit, 1961)
Eagle of Gloucester, Inc. v. Consolidated Fisheries, Inc., Libellant, Two Cases
268 F.2d 555 (First Circuit, 1959)
Pannizzo v. Lauro
228 F.2d 222 (Second Circuit, 1955)