Pannizzo v. Lauro
This text of 228 F.2d 222 (Pannizzo v. Lauro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pietro PANNIZZO, Administrator of the Estate of Anna Pannizzo, Deceased, Libellant-Appellee,
v.
Achille LAURO, Respondent,
Home Lines Agency Inc., Garnishee-Appellant.
No. 99.
Docket 23688.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Submitted November 7, 1955.
Decided December 6, 1955.
Gray & Wythe, New York City (Horace M. Gray, New York City, of counsel), for garnishee-appellant.
Arkin & Kottler, New York City (Edward Arkin, New York City, of counsel), for libellant-appellee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The order of the district court here attempted to be brought before us allowed the case, with its clause for foreign attachment, to proceed, but settled no rights or liabilities of the parties. Hence it is not presently appealable. See Petition of Wills Lines, Inc., 2 Cir., 227 F.2d 509, and cases cited, interpreting 28 U.S.C. § 1292(3).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 F.2d 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pannizzo-v-lauro-ca2-1955.