Panini America, Inc. v. Fanatics, Inc

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 21, 2025·No. 1:23-cv-09714·Unknown

Opinion

BOIES SCHILLER Qne. FLEXNER November 27, 2024 Via ECF The Honorable Valerie Figueredo United States District Court Magistrate Judge Southern District of New York Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: Panini America, Inc. v. Fanatics, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-09714-LTS (S.D.N.Y. 2023); Fanatics Collectibles TopCo, Inc. v. Panini S.p.A., Case No. 1:23-cv-06895-LTS (S.D.N.Y 2023) Dear Judge Figueredo: We write on behalf of the Panini entities (“Panini”) in the above-referenced matters to request permission to file under seal an unredacted version of Panini’s letter response to ECF No. 131 (the “Letter Response”) and five letters attached thereto. These letters relate to a dispute that arises out of a production services agreement between Panini and its trading card manufacturer GCP. The parties to this agreement agreed it would be treated as confidential. See Ex. 1 at 21, 4 B(a). The five letters at issue refer to confidential terms of the production services agreement and contain sensitive business communications. Further, the Letter Response itself contains limited sensitive business communications relating to the confidential production services agreement, which Panini requests be redacted. Accordingly, Panini respectfully submits that good cause exists to file under seal the Letter Response and the exhibits to the Letter Response. Pursuant to the Court’s individual rules, Panini is filing proposed sealed documents electronically through the Court’s ECF system. Panini is also filing a redacted version of the Letter Response publicly on the docket. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Eric Brenner Eric Brenner

\ \ Ni \ M \ PX ye HON. VALERIE FIGUEREDO—— UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: 5/21/2025 The motion to seal is GRANTED. The exhibits refer to confidential terms of the production services agreement and contain sensitive business communications. See, e.g., FuboTV Inc. v. Walt Disney Co., No. 24-CV-01363 (MMG), 2024 WL 1884974 *1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2024) (sealing documents that “contain commercially sensitive and confidential business information, specifically documents that concern Fubo's carriage agreements with Defendants and proprietary financial analyses, marketing data, and business strategies”); Nielson Consumer LLC v. Circana Grp., L.P., No. 22-CV-3235 (JPO)(KHP), 2024 WL 388715 *3 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2024) (granting a sealing motion because the information the parties sought to seal pertained to

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Panini America, Inc. v. Fanatics, Inc, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Panini America, Inc. v. Fanatics, Inc (Panini America, Inc. v. Fanatics, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.