Paniag v. West
This text of 11 Vet. App. 19 (Paniag v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
On June 11, 1997, counsel for the appellant filed a motion for panel reconsideration or, in the alternative, review en bane. On July 14, 1997, a judge of the Court requested en banc review. On July 80, 1997, a panel of the Court denied the appellant’s motion for reconsideration.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, and the record on appeal, and it not appearing that review en bane is necessary either to address a question of exceptional importance to the administration of laws affecting veterans benefits or to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions, it is
ORDERED that en banc review is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Vet. App. 19, 1998 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 152, 1998 WL 54760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paniag-v-west-cavc-1998.