Home/Ninth Circuit/Pangilinan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Pangilinan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

809 F.2d 1449, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7639
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 1987
DocketNos. 80-4543, 81-5427
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 809 F.2d 1449 (Pangilinan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pangilinan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 809 F.2d 1449, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7639 (9th Cir. 1987).

Opinions

[1450]*1450ORDER

The panel, as constituted above, has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for a rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for en banc rehearing and upon the vote of the eligible judges in active service, a majority failed to vote for en banc rehearing.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED, and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is REJECTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Re Naturalization of Antolin Punsalan Pangilinan, Petitioners v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Re Naturalization of Mario Valderrama Litonjua v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
809 F.2d 1449 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
809 F.2d 1449, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pangilinan-v-immigration-naturalization-service-ca9-1987.