Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Palmore v. State

Palmore v. State

735 So. 2d 521, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5797, 1999 WL 279519
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 7, 1999
DocketNo. 99-01403
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 735 So. 2d 521 (Palmore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palmore v. State, 735 So. 2d 521, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5797, 1999 WL 279519 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ricky Lee Palmore appeals an order dismissing his motion for postconviction relief. The order states that the motion was not filed under oath or with the unno-tarized oath allowed by State v. Shearer, 628 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1993). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. The trial court dismissed the motion without prejudice to file a proper motion, and also denied a timely motion for rehearing. Oddly, both the motion for postconviction relief and the motion for rehearing filed by Mr. Palmore contain the permissible unnotarized oath. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
884 So. 2d 374 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
735 So. 2d 521, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5797, 1999 WL 279519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmore-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.