Home/Supreme Court/Palmer v. Wainwright

Palmer v. Wainwright

374 U.S. 507, 83 S. Ct. 1881
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 17, 1963·No. 788, Misc·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

374 U.S. 507 (1963)

PALMER
v.
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.

No. 788, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 17, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmer v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 507, 83 S. Ct. 1881 (1963).

374 U.S. 507 (Palmer v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
157 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)