Palmer v. State
967 So. 2d 359, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15948, 2007 WL 2935406
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Palmer v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 946 So. 2d 28 →
Opinion
The appellant’s prior motion for postcon-viction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 was denied by the sixteenth judicial circuit on June 2, 2006, and his appeal from that order was affirmed on the merits by this Court on December 27, 2006. Palmer v. State, 946 So.2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). The “second amended motion” therefore is barred as successive, and it was correctly dismissed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(f). See Frazier v. State, 898 So.2d 1183, 1184 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Palmer v. State, 967 So. 2d 359, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15948, 2007 WL 2935406 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
967 So. 2d 359 (Palmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frazier v. State
898 So. 2d 1183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Palmer v. State
946 So. 2d 28 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)