Palmer v. State

935 So. 2d 630, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13330, 2006 WL 2285792
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 2006·No. No. 1D06-1190·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. See Diaz v. State, 910 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (remanding for correction of scrivener’s error in the judgment); Bolware v. State, 668 So.2d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (same). The judgment erroneously recites that' the appellant was convicted of aggravated battery causing great bodily harm under section 784.045(l)(a), when the appellant entered a plea to the lesser included offense of felony battery. The judgment must be corrected to reflect the appellant’s conviction for felony battery, not aggravated battery.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

KAHN, C.J., DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmer v. State, 935 So. 2d 630, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13330, 2006 WL 2285792 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

935 So. 2d 630 (Palmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Masterson v. State
133 So. 3d 1085 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)