Palmer v. State

743 So. 2d 80, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11838, 1999 WL 683131
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Palmer v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 681 So. 2d 767
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 3, 1999·No. No. 98-1506·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant seeks review of a ten-year habitual offender sentence imposed for possession of more than 20 grams of marijuana. Section 775.084(l)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1997), expressly precludes an habitual offender sentence for a felony which is a violation of section 893.13 “relating to the purchase or the possession of a controlled substance.” Possession of more than 20 grams of marijuana is such an offense. §§ 893.13(l)(a)2 & 893.03(l)(c)7, Fla. Stat. (1997). Appellant did not object to the sentence in the trial court. However, we have held that such a sentence constitutes fundamental error, which may be raised for the first time on appeal. Nelson v. State, 719 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (general division en banc). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand to the trial court for resentencing. As we did in Nelson, we certify conflict with Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA) (en banc), review granted, 718 So.2d 169 (Fla.1998).

SENTENCE VACATED - and REMANDED.

BARFIELD, C.J., WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmer v. State, 743 So. 2d 80, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11838, 1999 WL 683131 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

743 So. 2d 80 (Palmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddox v. State
708 So. 2d 617 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Nelson v. State
719 So. 2d 1230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)