Palmer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Palmer v. State

707 So. 2d 423, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3128, 1998 WL 142836

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 31, 1998

DocketNo. 97-2583

StatusPublished

This text of 707 So. 2d 423 (Palmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palmer v. State, 707 So. 2d 423, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3128, 1998 WL 142836 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Appellant seeks remand for entry of a written order of violation of community control to conform with the oral pronouncement of the trial court. However, as this alleged deficiency was not properly preserved and does not constitute fundamental error, it cannot be addressed by this court. See § 924.051(l)(b) & (3), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and WOLF, JJ. and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Appellant seeks remand for entry of a written order of violation of community control to conform with the oral pronouncement of the trial court. However, as this alleged deficiency was not properly preserved and does not constitute fundamental error, it cannot be addressed by this court. See § 924.051(l)(b) & (3), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and WOLF, JJ. and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

707 So. 2d 423, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3128, 1998 WL 142836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.