Palmer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Palmer v. State

707 So. 2d 423, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3128, 1998 WL 142836

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Palmer v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 664 So. 2d 1162 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 31, 1998·No. No. 97-2583·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Appellant seeks remand for entry of a written order of violation of community control to conform with the oral pronouncement of the trial court. However, as this alleged deficiency was not properly preserved and does not constitute fundamental error, it cannot be addressed by this court. See § 924.051(l)(b) & (3), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and WOLF, JJ. and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Appellant seeks remand for entry of a written order of violation of community control to conform with the oral pronouncement of the trial court. However, as this alleged deficiency was not properly preserved and does not constitute fundamental error, it cannot be addressed by this court. See § 924.051(l)(b) & (3), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and WOLF, JJ. and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.

Palmer v. State, 707 So. 2d 423, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3128, 1998 WL 142836 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

707 So. 2d 423 (Palmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.