Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Palmer v. City of New York

Palmer v. City of New York

215 A.D.2d 336, 627 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5787
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 30, 1995·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Fern Fisher-Brandveen, J.), entered April 5, 1994, which granted defendants’ motion dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff failed to serve a notice of claim, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion denied.

Plaintiff’s complaint, which sets forth Executive Law claims against defendants for alleged unlawful discriminatory practices under the Human Rights Law, should not have been dismissed. The notice of claim requirement (see, General Municipal Law § 50-i) is hot applicable to such claims. (Ibid., Alaimo v New York City Dept, of Sanitation, 203 AD2d 501; Simpson v New York City Tr. Auth., 188 AD2d 522, 523.) The complaint is reinstated. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmer v. City of New York, 215 A.D.2d 336, 627 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

215 A.D.2d 336 (Palmer v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eugene Margerum v. City of Buffalo
28 N.E.3d 515 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
Lee v. City of Syracuse
603 F. Supp. 2d 417 (N.D. New York, 2009)
Kellogg v. Office of the Chief Medical Examiner
6 Misc. 3d 666 (New York Supreme Court, 2004)
Gentile v. Town of Huntington
288 F. Supp. 2d 316 (E.D. New York, 2003)
Kovachevich v. New York City Housing Authority
295 A.D.2d 255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Picciano v. Nassau County Civil Service Commission
290 A.D.2d 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)