Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Palma v. Town of North Hempstead

Palma v. Town of North Hempstead

168 A.D. 896
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Palma v. Town of North Hempstead. Read the opinion of the Court — 171 A.D. 937 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1915·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The orders appealed from are affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the motions were prematurely made, without prejudice to a renewal of the motions upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses after issue joined. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. In each case order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses after issue joined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palma v. Town of North Hempstead, 168 A.D. 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

168 A.D. 896 (Palma v. Town of North Hempstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.