Palma v. Town of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Palma v. Town of North Hempstead

168 A.D. 896

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A.D. 896 (Palma v. Town of North Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palma v. Town of North Hempstead, 168 A.D. 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The orders appealed from are affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the motions were prematurely made, without prejudice to a renewal of the motions upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses after issue joined. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. In each case order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses after issue joined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The orders appealed from are affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the motions were prematurely made, without prejudice to a renewal of the motions upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses after issue joined. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. In each case order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses after issue joined.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palma-v-town-of-north-hempstead-nyappdiv-1915.