Palm Beach County Dog Fanciers Ass'n v. Albers

200 A.D.2d 486, 606 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 482

This text of 200 A.D.2d 486 (Palm Beach County Dog Fanciers Ass'n v. Albers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palm Beach County Dog Fanciers Ass'n v. Albers, 200 A.D.2d 486, 606 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 482 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart C. Cohen, J.), entered July 31, 1992, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, a non-profit corporation of Palm Beach dog breeders and exhibitors, alleges that its application for membership in the American Kennel Club (AKC), the largest and most respected organization of dog breeders and exhibitors in the United States, was denied because of untrue, slanderous statements made by defendants to other AKC delegates at its annual meeting, namely, that plaintiff’s membership application had been "pushed through” AKC’s board of directors, that individual members of plaintiff had retained profits from shows sponsored by plaintiff, that members of plaintiff do not reside in the Palm Beach vicinity, and that plaintiff had not held the requisite number of match shows. We agree with the IAS Court that the first, third, and fourth of these statements do not impugn plaintiff’s basic integrity (see, Ruder & Finn v Seaboard Sur. Co., 52 NY2d 663, 670), and that the second statement does not impute any improper conduct to plaintiff as opposed to the unnamed individual members (see, Ithaca Coll, v Yale Daily News Publ. Co., 85 AD2d 817; Carlucci v Poughkeepsie Newspapers, 57 NY2d 883, 885). As the com[487]*487plaint was properly dismissed for failure to state a cause of action, we find it unnecessary to decide the jurisdictional issue. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlucci v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers, Inc.
442 N.E.2d 442 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.
422 N.E.2d 518 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Ithaca College v. Yale Daily News Publishing Co.
85 A.D.2d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 A.D.2d 486, 606 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palm-beach-county-dog-fanciers-assn-v-albers-nyappdiv-1994.