Carlucci v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers, Inc.
This text of 442 N.E.2d 442 (Carlucci v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs.
*885 We do not reach the issue of gross irresponsibility decided by the Appellate Division because we conclude, as a matter of law, that the article was not of and concerning the corporation. The reading public acquainted with the parties and the subject (see Sydney v Macfadden Newspaper Pub. Corp., 242 NY 208, 214) could not take the article, which never mentioned the corporation, stated that the individual named was the owner of the store and referred only to his gambling activity, as “of and concerning” the corporation, the more particularly because a corporation cannot be arrested.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Judge Gabrielli taking no part.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
442 N.E.2d 442, 57 N.Y.2d 883, 456 N.Y.S.2d 44, 8 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2503, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlucci-v-poughkeepsie-newspapers-inc-ny-1982.