Palamara v. WORLD CLASS YACHTS INC.

824 So. 2d 194, 2002 WL 1059719
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 29, 2002
Docket4D01-3260
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 824 So. 2d 194 (Palamara v. WORLD CLASS YACHTS INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palamara v. WORLD CLASS YACHTS INC., 824 So. 2d 194, 2002 WL 1059719 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

824 So.2d 194 (2002)

Ron PALAMARA, Appellant,
v.
WORLD CLASS YACHTS, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D01-3260.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 29, 2002.
Rehearing Denied September 4, 2002.

James E. Brown, Jr. of Brown, Sharkey & Associates, P.A., Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Ronald Payne, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a non-final order denying his motion to set aside a default. Although an order denying a motion to vacate a non-final order of default is not appealable, Tieche v. Fla. Physicians Ins. Reciprocal, 431 So.2d 287 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), appellant asserts an argument that the court did not have jurisdiction over him because he was not properly served with notice. We address only that issue.

The trial court found that appellant had attempted to evade service by running *195 away from the process server. There was evidence showing that, as the server attempted to serve appellant outside his place of business, appellant ran inside and would not come out. In addition, testimony showed that appellant was informed of the contents of the notice, that the notice was placed on the door through which appellant later came out, and that the appellant had picked the papers up. This evidence was sufficient to support the finding that appellant had been personally served. Olin Corp. v. Haney, 245 So.2d 669 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); Liberman v. Commercial Nat'l Bank of Broward County, 256 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

We do not, as we indicated earlier, have jurisdiction to review any of the other issues concerning the non-final order of default. Tieche. Affirmed.

FARMER, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DANIELLA BECKER v. TIMOTHY BECKER
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
Coffin v. Brandau
614 F.3d 1240 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
John Coffin v. Stacy Brandau
642 F.3d 999 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Reinhard
352 F. App'x 309 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
Hull v. LENDING HOUSE, INC.
19 So. 3d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
AVENTURA BEACH CLUB CONDO. v. Blaustein
997 So. 2d 1185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Bove v. Bove
888 A.2d 123 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
824 So. 2d 194, 2002 WL 1059719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palamara-v-world-class-yachts-inc-fladistctapp-2002.