Liberman v. COMMERCIAL NAT. BANK OF BROWARD CTY.

256 So. 2d 63
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1971·No. 71-704·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

256 So.2d 63 (1971)

Haskell M. LIBERMAN and Leatrice Liberman, Appellants,
v.
COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK OF BROWARD COUNTY, a National Banking Association, Appellee.

No. 71-704.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 15, 1971.

Daniel I. Wincor, North Bay Village, for appellants.

Kenneth G. Stevens, of Dale & Stevens, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

OWEN, Judge.

By interlocutory appeal appellants seek review of an order denying their motion to quash service of process upon them.

Evidence was presented from which the trial court could find that Mr. Liberman sought to avoid service of process by the expedient of running into his house and closing the door upon seeing the process server approach, somewhat similar to the conduct of Mr. Haney in the case of Haney v. Olin Corp., Fla.App. 1971, 245 So.2d 671. *64 The process server (a deputy sheriff) testified that, being thus frustrated by Mr. Liberman's conduct, he then left the copy of process and suit papers in the mail box, drove his car around the block and parked where he could observe the Liberman residence. Shortly thereafter, he observed Mr. Liberman come out of the house, go to the mail box, remove the papers therefrom, and return to the house.

While this approaches outer limits, we conclude on the basis of our decision in the Haney case, supra, that personal service on Mr. Liberman was perfected under F.S. section 48.031, F.S.A. Obviously, there was no personal service on his wife, appellant Leatrice Liberman, and the facts which we have related would not support substituted service upon her. Olin Corp. v. Haney, Fla.App. 1971, 245 So.2d 669.

The order is affirmed as to appellant Haskell M. Liberman, and reversed as to appellant Leatrice Liberman.

REED, C.J., and CROSS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liberman v. COMMERCIAL NAT. BANK OF BROWARD CTY., 256 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

256 So. 2d 63 (Liberman v. COMMERCIAL NAT. BANK OF BROWARD CTY.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DANIELLA BECKER v. TIMOTHY BECKER
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
Coffin v. Brandau
614 F.3d 1240 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
John Coffin v. Stacy Brandau
642 F.3d 999 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Reinhard
352 F. App'x 309 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
Boatfloat, LLC v. Central Transport Intern.
941 So. 2d 1271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
SH v. Department of Children and Families
837 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Palamara v. WORLD CLASS YACHTS INC.
824 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Schupak v. Sutton Hill Associates
710 So. 2d 707 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Henzel v. Noel
598 So. 2d 220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Bellegue v. Fig Tree Corp.
21 Fla. Supp. 2d 57 (Volusia County Court, 1987)
Varn v. Varn
16 Fla. Supp. 2d 58 (Palm Beach County Court, 1985)
Dowd Shipping, Inc. v. Lee
354 So. 2d 1252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)