Paglia v. Agrawal
This text of 509 N.E.2d 353 (Paglia v. Agrawal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from, denying a motion to vacate a prior dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3404, does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. (Le Frois Foods Corp. v Aetna Ins. Co., 74 AD2d 730, mots to dismiss appeal granted 49 NY2d 1043; Til v O’Brien, 53 AD2d 1030, appeal dismissed 40 NY2d 902; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 36 [b], at 143-144).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
509 N.E.2d 353, 69 N.Y.2d 946, 516 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paglia-v-agrawal-ny-1987.