Marks v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
737 N.E.2d 949, 95 N.Y.2d 874, 714 N.Y.S.2d 707, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3419
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see, Paglia v Agrawal, 69 NY2d 946).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marks v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 737 N.E.2d 949, 95 N.Y.2d 874, 714 N.Y.S.2d 707, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3419 (N.Y. 2000).
737 N.E.2d 949 (Marks v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paglia v. Agrawal
509 N.E.2d 353 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)