Marks v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
737 N.E.2d 949, 95 N.Y.2d 874, 714 N.Y.S.2d 707, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3419
This text of 737 N.E.2d 949 (Marks v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marks v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 737 N.E.2d 949, 95 N.Y.2d 874, 714 N.Y.S.2d 707, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3419 (N.Y. 2000).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see, Paglia v Agrawal, 69 NY2d 946).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Paglia v. Agrawal
509 N.E.2d 353 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
737 N.E.2d 949, 95 N.Y.2d 874, 714 N.Y.S.2d 707, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marks-v-westinghouse-electric-corp-ny-2000.