Page v. State

88 So. 3d 359, 2012 WL 1605349, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7228
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Page v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 So. 3d 23
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2012·No. No. 3D12-763·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Adams v. State, 76 So.3d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional); see also Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138, 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) [review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011), and acknowledging “uncertainty caused by Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011) ]” but reaffirming its view that section 893.13 is constitutional).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Page v. State, 88 So. 3d 359, 2012 WL 1605349, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7228 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

88 So. 3d 359 (Page v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Little v. State
77 So. 3d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Adams v. State
76 So. 3d 367 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
71 So. 3d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
802 F. Supp. 2d 1289 (M.D. Florida, 2011)