Page v. Clark Refining & Marketing, Inc.
This text of 996 S.W.2d 678 (Page v. Clark Refining & Marketing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Dorothy Page appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s order dismissing her application for review for failing to comply with 8 CSR 20-3.030(3)(A) in that she did not sufficiently state reasons why the Administrative Law Judge’s findings and conclusions were in [679]*679error. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
996 S.W.2d 678, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/page-v-clark-refining-marketing-inc-moctapp-1999.