Padilla v. Lever

446 F.3d 963, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10589
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Padilla v. Lever. Read the opinion of the Court — 463 F.3d 1046
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2006·No. 03-56259·Published

Opinion

446 F.3d 963

Sandra PADILLA; Victor Sanchez; Rosa Andrade, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Rosalyn LEVER, in her official capacity as Registrar of Voters, Orange County Registration and Elections Department; Suzanne Slupsky, in her official capacity as Assistant Registrar of Voters, Orange County Registration and Elections Department, Defendants-Appellees, and
Vivian Martinez, Defendant.

No. 03-56259.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 28, 2006.

Thomas A. Saenz, Esq., Steven J. Reyes, Esq., Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund (MALDEF) Voting Rights Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Benjamin P. de Mayo, Esq., Wendy J. Phillips, Esq., Orange County Counsel's Office, Hall of Administration, Santa Ana, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Michael Strumwasser, Esq., Strumwasser & Woocher, Santa Monica, CA, for Defendant.

Before MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

A majority of the en banc court has voted to withdraw the opinion of the three judge panel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padilla v. Lever, 446 F.3d 963, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10589 (9th Cir. 2006).

446 F.3d 963 (Padilla v. Lever) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. Lever
446 F.3d 963 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)