Padilla v. Lever

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Padilla v. Lever. Read the opinion of the Court — 463 F.3d 1046
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2006·No. 03-56259·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDRA PADILLA; VICTOR SANCHEZ;  ROSA ANDRADE, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

ROSALYN LEVER, in her official capacity as Registrar of Voters, Orange County Registration and No. 03-56259 Elections Department; SUZANNE SLUPSKY, in her official capacity as  D.C. No.

CV-02-01145-AHS

Assistant Registrar of Voters, ORDER Orange County Registration and Elections Department, Defendants-Appellees,

and

VIVIAN MARTINEZ, Defendant.

Filed April 28, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

A majority of the en banc court has voted to withdraw the opinion of the three judge panel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Padilla v. Lever, (9th Cir. 2006).

Padilla v. Lever (Padilla v. Lever) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.