Padgett v. United States

102 F. App'x 801
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 21, 2004
Docket04-6199
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 F. App'x 801 (Padgett v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Padgett v. United States, 102 F. App'x 801 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Darrell L. Padgett appeals from the district court’s adoption of the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny Padgett’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for reduction of his sentence. Padgett based his motion on Amendment 591 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Because our review of the record shows that application of Amendment 591 would not change the calculation of Padgett’s sentence, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padgett v. United States
543 U.S. 1075 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 F. App'x 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padgett-v-united-states-ca4-2004.