Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

PADEN EL BEY: TIFFANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:23-cv-00392-GMN-NJK vs. ) ) ORDER HOCHSCHILD ROGER C, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 14), of United States Magistrate Judge Nancy Koppe, which recommends dismissing this case without prejudice. A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). /// Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 14) (setting a September 1, 2023, deadline for objections). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 14), is ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Dated this _7___ day of September, 2023. ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge United States District Court