Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild

D. Nevada

Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild

DecidedMarch 21, 2023

Docket2:23-cv-00392

StatusUnknown

This text of Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild (Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild, (D. Nev. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6] PADEN EL BEY: TIFFANY, Case No. 2:23-cv-00392-GMN-NJK 7 Plaintiff ORDER 8] HOCHSCHILD ROGER C, et al. 10 Defendants. 11 Plaintiff filed a billing error notice on the docket. Docket No. 6. “Local Rule 7—2 of the 12|| Local Rules of Civil Practice permits the filing of a motion, a response, and a reply. A document 13] not allowed by Local Rule 7—2, or otherwise permitted by order of this Court, is a fugitive 14] document and must be stricken from the record.” Reiger v. Nivens, No. 3:12-cv-00218-MMD- VPC, 2014 WL 537613, *3 (D. Nev. 2014). Plaintiff's filing is not a motion, response, or reply. 16|| The filing also contains unredacted financial account information and, therefore, fails to comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)(4). See Docket No. 6 at 2, 6, 11, 18] 15-18. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to strike the filing at Docket No. 6 and 20] return the documents to Plaintiff forthwith. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: March 21, 2023 23 PES Fo Nancy Koppe 24 ‘United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6] PADEN EL BEY: TIFFANY, Case No. 2:23-cv-00392-GMN-NJK 7 Plaintiff ORDER 8] HOCHSCHILD ROGER C, et al. 10 Defendants. 11 Plaintiff filed a billing error notice on the docket. Docket No. 6. “Local Rule 7—2 of the 12|| Local Rules of Civil Practice permits the filing of a motion, a response, and a reply. A document 13] not allowed by Local Rule 7—2, or otherwise permitted by order of this Court, is a fugitive 14] document and must be stricken from the record.” Reiger v. Nivens, No. 3:12-cv-00218-MMD- VPC, 2014 WL 537613, *3 (D. Nev. 2014). Plaintiff's filing is not a motion, response, or reply. 16|| The filing also contains unredacted financial account information and, therefore, fails to comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)(4). See Docket No. 6 at 2, 6, 11, 18] 15-18. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to strike the filing at Docket No. 6 and 20] return the documents to Plaintiff forthwith. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: March 21, 2023 23 PES Fo Nancy Koppe 24 ‘United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paden-el-bey-tiffany-v-hochschild-nvd-2023.