Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild

D. Nevada

Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided March 21, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-00392·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6] PADEN EL BEY: TIFFANY, Case No. 2:23-cv-00392-GMN-NJK 7 Plaintiff ORDER 8] HOCHSCHILD ROGER C, et al. 10 Defendants. 11 Plaintiff filed a billing error notice on the docket. Docket No. 6. “Local Rule 7—2 of the 12|| Local Rules of Civil Practice permits the filing of a motion, a response, and a reply. A document 13] not allowed by Local Rule 7—2, or otherwise permitted by order of this Court, is a fugitive 14] document and must be stricken from the record.” Reiger v. Nivens, No. 3:12-cv-00218-MMD- VPC, 2014 WL 537613, *3 (D. Nev. 2014). Plaintiff's filing is not a motion, response, or reply. 16|| The filing also contains unredacted financial account information and, therefore, fails to comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)(4). See Docket No. 6 at 2, 6, 11, 18] 15-18. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to strike the filing at Docket No. 6 and 20] return the documents to Plaintiff forthwith. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: March 21, 2023 23 PES Fo Nancy Koppe 24 ‘United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6] PADEN EL BEY: TIFFANY, Case No. 2:23-cv-00392-GMN-NJK 7 Plaintiff ORDER 8] HOCHSCHILD ROGER C, et al. 10 Defendants. 11 Plaintiff filed a billing error notice on the docket. Docket No. 6. “Local Rule 7—2 of the 12|| Local Rules of Civil Practice permits the filing of a motion, a response, and a reply. A document 13] not allowed by Local Rule 7—2, or otherwise permitted by order of this Court, is a fugitive 14] document and must be stricken from the record.” Reiger v. Nivens, No. 3:12-cv-00218-MMD- VPC, 2014 WL 537613, *3 (D. Nev. 2014). Plaintiff's filing is not a motion, response, or reply. 16|| The filing also contains unredacted financial account information and, therefore, fails to comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)(4). See Docket No. 6 at 2, 6, 11, 18] 15-18. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to strike the filing at Docket No. 6 and 20] return the documents to Plaintiff forthwith. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: March 21, 2023 23 PES Fo Nancy Koppe 24 ‘United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28

Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild, (D. Nev. 2023).

Pincite

Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild (Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Hochschild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.