Paddon v. Superior Court

224 P. 474, 65 Cal. App. 479, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 591
California Court of Appeal·Decided February 1, 1924·No. Civ. No. 4888.·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

[1] It appearing to the court that proceedings were pending charging the petitioner, William Locke Paddon, with contempt of the orders of the trial court at the time the order herein sought to be reviewed was made; and it further appearing that the said William Locke Paddon is the real party in interest herein;

It is ordered that the petition for a writ of prohibition be denied upon the authority of Knoob v. Knoob, 192 Cal. 95 *Page 480 [218 P. 568], Soderberg v. Soderberg, 63 Cal.App. 492 [219 P. 82], and Weeks v. Superior Court, 187 Cal. 620 [203 P. 93].

All the Justices concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on February 21, 1924, and an application by petitioners to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on March 31, 1924.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paddon v. Superior Court, 224 P. 474, 65 Cal. App. 479, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 591 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924).

224 P. 474 (Paddon v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stone v. Bach
80 Cal. App. 3d 442 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
Hull v. Superior Court
352 P.2d 161 (California Supreme Court, 1960)
Estate of Scott
310 P.2d 46 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Scott v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank
310 P.2d 46 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Tobin v. Casaus
275 P.2d 792 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)
Travis v. Travis
200 P.2d 843 (California Court of Appeal, 1948)
Funfar v. Superior Court
290 P. 626 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)