Travis v. Travis

California Court of Appeal

Travis v. Travis

200 P.2d 843, 89 Cal. App. 2d 291

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 22, 1948

DocketCiv. No. 16433

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 200 P.2d 843 (Travis v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Travis v. Travis, 200 P.2d 843, 89 Cal. App. 2d 291 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

VALLÉE, J.

Defendant appealed from a minute order adjudging him in contempt for failure to comply with an interlocutory decree of divorce entered November 15,1945, ordering him to pay money to plaintiff for the support of herself and three minor children and attorney’s fees and costs. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that an appeal does not lie from an order adjudging a party in contempt.

The law is settled that an appeal does not lie from a judgment or order made in a contempt proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1222; Taylor v. Superior Court, 20 Cal.2d 244, 246 [125 P.2d 1], and cases there cited; Phillips v. Superior Court, 22 Cal.2d 256, 257 [138 P.2d 838]; Weber v. Superior Court, 26 Cal.2d 144, 148 [156 P.2d 923]; Heck v. Heck, 63 Cal.App.2d 477, 478 [147 P.2d 114].)

Appeal dismissed.

Shinn, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI