Pacific Trading Co. v. United States

75 F. 519, 21 C.C.A. 441, 1 Alaska Fed. 474, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2051
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 29, 1896
DocketNo. 182
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 75 F. 519 (Pacific Trading Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacific Trading Co. v. United States, 75 F. 519, 21 C.C.A. 441, 1 Alaska Fed. 474, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2051 (9th Cir. 1896).

Opinion

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of forfeiture of the schooner Alexander for killing sea otter and seal in violation of the provisions of section 1956 of the Revised Statutes, as amended March 2, 1889 (16 U.S.C.A. § 644 and note). The fourth finding of the court is to the effect that the vessel, her master, officers, and crew, did, on the 5th day of June, 1893, kill two sea otters within 11 miles of the shore of Tugidak island. The fifth finding is to the effect that the vessel, her master, officers, and crew, on the 13th day of June, 1893, did kill one sea otter, and on the 25th of June, 1893, did kill six sea otters and one fur seal, within certain degrees of latitude and longitude, therein mentioned. The sixth finding is that none of the animals mentioned in finding 5 “were actually killed within four marine leagues of any shore of Alaska territory, but they were all killed between the mainland of the Alaska peninsula and a line drawn from the southern end of Tugidak island to Chirikoff island, thence [475]*475in the direction of the mainland through the Semidi group, and on to touch Sutkwik island, and thence to the mainland.” It thus appears that all the animals when killed by the officers and crew of the Alexander were at a point distant more than three miles from the shore. This fact brings the case within the principles announced in La Ninfa (just decided) 75 F. 513. Upon the authority of that case the decree of the district court is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to the district court to dismiss the bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maul v. United States
274 U.S. 501 (Supreme Court, 1927)
The St. Paul
1 Alaska 71 (D. Alaska, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 F. 519, 21 C.C.A. 441, 1 Alaska Fed. 474, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-trading-co-v-united-states-ca9-1896.