Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

195 P.2d 925, 86 Cal. App. 2d 924
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 Cal. App. 2d 726
California Court of Appeal·Decided July 13, 1948·No. Civ. No. 16398·Published

Opinion

MOORE, P. J.

Celia Angulo was an employee of Rothschild-Kaufman Company on February 20, 1947, and was injured in the course of her employment. The facts are identical with those set forth in Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., et ad., No. 16396, ante, p. 726 [195 P.2d 919], this day filed. The same authorities apply and the same conclusion has been reached. Basing the decision upon the opinion filed in that action the award is affirmed.

MeComb, J., and Wilson, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied July 30, 1948.

Petitioner’s application for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied September 8,1948. Schauer, J., and Spence, J., voted for a hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 195 P.2d 925, 86 Cal. App. 2d 924 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948).

195 P.2d 925 (Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
195 P.2d 919 (California Court of Appeal, 1948)