Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

195 P.2d 925, 86 Cal. App. 2d 923
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 Cal. App. 2d 726
California Court of Appeal·Decided July 13, 1948·No. Civ. No. 16397·Published

Opinion

MOORE, P. J.

The facts in this case are identical with those in Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., et al, No. 16396, ante, p. 726 [195 P.2d 919], this day filed, with the exception that “pieces of windows of the employer’s premises” were the instrumentality that directly caused the employee’s injuries. Basing the decision herein upon the conclusion derived from the review of cause No. 16396 the writ is discharged and the award is affirmed.

MeComb, J., and Wilson, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied July 30, 1948.

Petitioner’s application for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied September 8, 1948. Schauer, J., and Spence, J., voted for a hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 195 P.2d 925, 86 Cal. App. 2d 923 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948).

195 P.2d 925 (Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
195 P.2d 919 (California Court of Appeal, 1948)