Home/Supreme Court/Pacific Express Co. v. Rudman

Pacific Express Co. v. Rudman

234 U.S. 752, 34 S. Ct. 776
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 11, 1914
DocketNo. 344
StatusPublished

This text of 234 U.S. 752 (Pacific Express Co. v. Rudman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacific Express Co. v. Rudman, 234 U.S. 752, 34 S. Ct. 776 (1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed [753]*753with costs on the authority of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Robinson, 233 U. S. 173; Kansas Southern Ry. v. Carl, 227 U. S. 637-652.

Mr. Cecil H. Smith and Mr. James L. Minnis for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Mark McMahon and Mr. H. A. Cunningham for-the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baxter v. Buchholz-Hill Transportation Co.
227 U.S. 637 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Robinson
233 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 U.S. 752, 34 S. Ct. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-express-co-v-rudman-scotus-1914.