Pacific Express Co. v. Rudman

234 U.S. 752, 34 S. Ct. 776
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 11, 1914·No. No. 344·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed [753] with costs on the authority of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Robinson, 233 U. S. 173; Kansas Southern Ry. v. Carl, 227 U. S. 637-652.

Mr. Cecil H. Smith and Mr. James L. Minnis for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Mark McMahon and Mr. H. A. Cunningham for-the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacific Express Co. v. Rudman, 234 U.S. 752, 34 S. Ct. 776 (1914).

234 U.S. 752 (Pacific Express Co. v. Rudman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baxter v. Buchholz-Hill Transportation Co.
227 U.S. 637 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Robinson
233 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1914)