Home/Supreme Court/Pacific Express Co. v. Malin

Pacific Express Co. v. Malin

131 U.S. 394, 9 S. Ct. 792, 33 L. Ed. 204, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2046
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 26, 1888
Docket1203
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 131 U.S. 394 (Pacific Express Co. v. Malin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacific Express Co. v. Malin, 131 U.S. 394, 9 S. Ct. 792, 33 L. Ed. 204, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2046 (1888).

Opinion

Per curiam

: This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Dismissed.

Mr. Phillips, at a later day, moved the court for the issuance of a mandate, and, as cause therefor, he stated that no notice of the motion for the mandate had been served on the opposite party; but that no opposition had been made to the dismissal of the case, and, as the dismissal had been made for want of jurisdiction, there would seem to be no reason why the mandate should be withheld.

Pee cueiam

: Sufficient cause has been shown, and the mandate may issue at once.

Mandate issued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Washington
16 F.2d 206 (Second Circuit, 1926)
Draper v. Clark
59 Ohio St. (N.S.) 336 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1898)
Radford v. Folsom
131 U.S. 392 (Supreme Court, 1888)
Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin
131 U.S. 394 (Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 U.S. 394, 9 S. Ct. 792, 33 L. Ed. 204, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacific-express-co-v-malin-scotus-1888.