Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin

131 U.S. 394, 33 L. Ed. 204, 9 S. Ct. 792, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2046
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 26, 1888·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

131 U.S. 394

9 S.Ct. 792

33 L.Ed. 204

PACIFIC EXP. CO.
v.
MALIN.

November 26, 1888.1

William H. Phillips, for the motion.

PER CURIAM.

This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Mr. Phillips, for defendant in error, afterwards moved for the issuance of a mandate, and stating that no notice of the motion for the mandate had been served on the opposite party, but that no opposition had been made to the dismissal of the case.

PER CURIAM.

Sufficient cause has been shown, and the mandate may issue at once. Mandate issued.

1

Publication delayed through failure to receive copy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin, 131 U.S. 394, 33 L. Ed. 204, 9 S. Ct. 792, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2046 (1888).

131 U.S. 394 (Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pacific Express Co. v. Malin
131 U.S. 394 (Supreme Court, 1888)