Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin

Supreme Court

Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin

131 U.S. 394, 33 L. Ed. 204, 9 S. Ct. 792, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2046

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 26, 1888

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 U.S. 394 (Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pacific Exp. Co. v. Malin, 131 U.S. 394, 33 L. Ed. 204, 9 S. Ct. 792, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2046 (1888).

Pincite

Opinion

131 U.S. 394

9 S.Ct. 792

33 L.Ed. 204

PACIFIC EXP. CO.
v.
MALIN.

November 26, 1888.1

William H. Phillips, for the motion.

PER CURIAM.

This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Mr. Phillips, for defendant in error, afterwards moved for the issuance of a mandate, and stating that no notice of the motion for the mandate had been served on the opposite party, but that no opposition had been made to the dismissal of the case.

Sufficient cause has been shown, and the mandate may issue at once. Mandate issued.

1

Publication delayed through failure to receive copy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI