Pacific Coast European Conference v. United States

382 U.S. 958, 86 S. Ct. 433, 15 L. Ed. 2d 362, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 52
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 13, 1965·No. No. 622·Published·Cited by 104 cases

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Dow Chemical Co. et al. to be added as parties respondent granted. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacific Coast European Conference v. United States, 382 U.S. 958, 86 S. Ct. 433, 15 L. Ed. 2d 362, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 52 (1965).

382 U.S. 958 (Pacific Coast European Conference v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Industrial Burner Systems, Inc. v. Maxon Corp.
275 F. Supp. 2d 878 (E.D. Michigan, 2003)
Alcaraz v. Block
746 F.2d 593 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
O'Connell v. Citrus Bowl, Inc.
99 F.R.D. 117 (E.D. New York, 1983)
Borough of Ellwood City v. Pennsylvania Power Co.
570 F. Supp. 553 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1983)
In Re Grand Jury Witness Chanie Weiss
703 F.2d 653 (Second Circuit, 1983)
Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
703 F.2d 534 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
Paceco, Inc. v. Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co.
468 F. Supp. 256 (N.D. California, 1979)
Roorda v. American Oil Co.
446 F. Supp. 939 (W.D. New York, 1978)
In Re Cueto
443 F. Supp. 857 (S.D. New York, 1978)
Red Apple Supermarkets, Inc. v. Deltown Foods, Inc.
419 F. Supp. 1256 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Glowacki v. Borden, Inc.
420 F. Supp. 348 (N.D. Illinois, 1976)